Especially when NOT tooted by the New York Times.
Anyone else memba when NYTimes reporter extordinaire, Andrew Revkin, so pompously ‘above it all’ when he emphatically stated (regarding the New York Times REFUSING to publish any and all of the ‘leaked’ East Anglia University ‘Exposing GloBull Warming for the Sham It Is’ emails) because …”The documents appear to have been acquired illegally and contain all manner of private information and statements that were never intended for the public eye, so they won’t be posted here.”
One can almost imagine the ‘Old Gray Lady’s’ multi-rhinoplastied nose pitched high in the air…indignant…and all.
And just what, oh what OCCURRED with the release of the of the East Anglia tell all emails? Some really, super sweet research grants went awry and some tenured Profs had to actually TEACH again? AlGore was recalled as Pope of the Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming? The Barky/Biden/Clinton/Emmanuel/Axelrod/Vah J.J.Jarett concocted, all wealth grabbing ‘Chicago Climate Exchange’ had to disband? GE was left with gazillions of curly light bulbs?
Its not like operatives in the MidEast had their lives on the line or anything…but…and with this bunch, there is always a but…
With the WikiLeaks springing forth over 250,000 pinholes in the SS Obama this weekend, operatives, both foreign and domestic have been compromised…some with the ultimate sacrifice, their very safety and lives…and yet the New York Times (because face it…it fits their leftie narative) sees fit to publish. Above the fold. To be continued infact…because the Wiki ness of it all ‘fits’ the paradigm of US “bad” and “needs taken down” whilst East Anglia emails just pretty much pointed out what most thinking people already knew, regarding anthropogenic ‘manmade’ global warming…’sham!!! wow!!!”
What the Times DIDN’T see fit to publish today was the whiny, begging missive ’don’t release the documents, mmmkay?’ letter sent by State Department Chief Legal Eagle, Howard Koh to ‘WikiLeaks’ (what, even I know its Julian Assange as Chief Operating Officer of Leakages). THAT would have embarassed Obama (and Hillary) so we couldn’t have that. It was, no doubt, sternly worded, and peppered with “please,” “pretty please,” and “with sugar on top…” (everyone, right up to Mrs. Clinton was a little worried about that turn of phrase…they don’t want the ‘empty calorie wrath of Michelle’ reigning down on them).
I wonder if the Times would have seen fit to publish what SHOULD have been sent (if State or any Obot agent had, as James Carville laments, “an extra one from Hillary…”) “Hey Julian, see anything in the sky, silently zipping your way??? Stay ALERT!!! LOLZ…Howie K….at State.”
Maybe some TOUGH TALK would have caused a few hundred thousands plugs?